<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Popdose - Latest Comments in DVD Review: &amp;#8220;Skins, Volume 1&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://popdose.disqus.com/</link><description>Culturally inspired writing.</description><atom:link href="https://popdose.disqus.com/dvd_review_8220skins_volume_18243/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 08:48:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: DVD Review: &amp;#8220;Skins, Volume 1&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://popdose.com/dvd-review-skins-volume-1/#comment-7880084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;it's in bristol, not london....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ela</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 08:48:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DVD Review: &amp;#8220;Skins, Volume 1&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://popdose.com/dvd-review-skins-volume-1/#comment-5629611</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm from England, and the third series of Skins just started last week. Its bloody brilliant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rodge</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:19:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DVD Review: &amp;#8220;Skins, Volume 1&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://popdose.com/dvd-review-skins-volume-1/#comment-5452736</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sure that the conversion is the issue.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Malchus</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:55:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DVD Review: &amp;#8220;Skins, Volume 1&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://popdose.com/dvd-review-skins-volume-1/#comment-5233415</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's an interesting distinction, but Skin was actually made and broadcast on the commercial channel Channel 4 or more specifically their digital channel E4 in the UK but distributed by the BBC it seems in the US.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The difference in picture quality, I think, is probably because of the differences in TV systems.  It will have been shot in PAL then converted to NTSC which has less lines overall.  That'll be less obvious on DVD.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stu</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 04:40:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DVD Review: &amp;#8220;Skins, Volume 1&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://popdose.com/dvd-review-skins-volume-1/#comment-5107022</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Then you should definitely check out the DVD's. Commercial free!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Malchus</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:19:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DVD Review: &amp;#8220;Skins, Volume 1&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://popdose.com/dvd-review-skins-volume-1/#comment-5106071</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've never seen &lt;i&gt;Skins&lt;/i&gt;, though I should check it out. Then again I try to avoid BBC-A whenever I can. The picture's quality's OK in NY; it's the commercials that are a total drag. I get sore fingers fast-forwarding through shows in search of actual content.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BobCashill</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:09:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>