<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Popdose - Latest Comments in No Concessions: Indy (and indies)</title><link>http://popdose.disqus.com/</link><description>Culturally inspired writing.</description><atom:link href="https://popdose.disqus.com/no_concessions_indy_and_indies_91/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 13:13:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: No Concessions: Indy (and indies)</title><link>http://popdose.com/no-concessions-indy-and-indies/#comment-567656</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I finally got around to seeing Indiana Jones yesterday, and while I agree with most everything you said, I thought I'd kick in my ante by praising the way the film turns '50s sci-fi/Russkie tropes on their head.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, in countless Cold War B-movies the aliens (or blobs, or bugs, or whatever) stood in for the Soviets and their monolithic, thought-free, totalitarian society.  Here, at a moment when the likelihood that we'll eventually see spaceships has already been established, the Lead Commie herself (Cate Blanchett) offers a chilling vision of Soviet hegemony that sounds awfully similar to what the aliens offered in films like Invasion of the Body Snatchers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(SPOILER ALERT!!!!) Once Crystal-Skullworld has been breached, however, the aliens' cave markings reveal them to have been something like pro-Western humanists, and the oval-brained beings themselves prove none too interested in helping Cate fulfill her Stalinist prophesy.  But then, Stephen almost always has a soft spot for his aliens (WotW notwithstanding).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(I also find it interesting that the mythical artifacts finally revealed at the ends of these Indy flicks so often turn out to be bad-guy Dustbusters, but that's another story.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JonCummings</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 13:13:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Concessions: Indy (and indies)</title><link>http://popdose.com/no-concessions-indy-and-indies/#comment-562914</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pay no attention to what this man is talking about. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BobCashill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 10:11:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Concessions: Indy (and indies)</title><link>http://popdose.com/no-concessions-indy-and-indies/#comment-561996</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My occasionally atrocious musical taste is an open book.  But Bob, get off Hall &amp;amp; Oates or I'll start dishing about your obsession with Pia Zadora.  And I'll offer a top 10 list of your best comments made while watching porn films in a dormitory basement.  (No. 3:  "Now THAT's a burning bush!")&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JonCummings</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 01:26:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Concessions: Indy (and indies)</title><link>http://popdose.com/no-concessions-indy-and-indies/#comment-561530</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When I interviewed Gordon in 1986, he mentioned that he and his writing partner had a script called "The Teeny Weenies," about miniaturized kids, that they planned to do. Didn't work out that way, but I bet he made more from that deal than any of his own pictures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[I saw his FROM BEYOND followup, DOLLS, at a Chicago grindhouse. It's a more child-like tale and the bloodthirsty audience hated it. It was a while till I saw another one of his movies, which got harder to find in cinemas as the multiplex model dug in. 1993's FORTRESS got a decent release.]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Folks, Hall &amp;amp; Oates is just the tip of the iceberg where Mr. Cummings' questionable taste is concerned. I promise to spill all if you make one of my entries No. 1.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[Trouble is, Jon remembers everything about our college youth, and I can't recall what I had for lunch yesterday. So he'll have to do the actual writing. But I know there has to be other skeletons in his musical closet.]&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BobCashill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 23:12:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Concessions: Indy (and indies)</title><link>http://popdose.com/no-concessions-indy-and-indies/#comment-560844</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just want to put in another good word for "The Visitor," which I just got around to seeing yesterday and which is a really wonderful film.  I smell OSCAR!!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And by the way, Bob, you'll never, NEVER get past the Worst #1s of the '80s!!!  It ain't gonna happen--certainly not with some mangy list of summer films, especially now that the summer movie season is half-over at the end of May. Besides, we built this website on rock and roll!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Really, you're just going to have to come up with a goofier list.  Top 10 body-part extractions in an indie horror film...top 10 sexual manipulations of a re-animated severed head...you know, something that says "quality" and "integrity.")&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JonCummings</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:57:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Concessions: Indy (and indies)</title><link>http://popdose.com/no-concessions-indy-and-indies/#comment-560216</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He shares story credit and was originally attached to direct, back when the working title was something like "Adventures in the Backyard." I can't imagine why Disney would have had any qualms about Stuart Gordon directing one of their pictures.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rsbrandt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 17:41:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Concessions: Indy (and indies)</title><link>http://popdose.com/no-concessions-indy-and-indies/#comment-559774</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Didn't Gordon also have something to do with "Honey, I Shrunk The Kids"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DwDunphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 16:20:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Concessions: Indy (and indies)</title><link>http://popdose.com/no-concessions-indy-and-indies/#comment-558500</link><description>&lt;p&gt;FROM BEYOND is terrific, and the uncut DVD a treat. It and the earlier RE-ANIMATOR are  a great double bill. I had that hat (and a RE-ANIMATOR poster) for some time. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BobCashill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 13:40:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Concessions: Indy (and indies)</title><link>http://popdose.com/no-concessions-indy-and-indies/#comment-556105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just wanted to speak up in favor of Stuart Gordon's "From Beyond," a film which I'd never seen until its recent DVD release but that I now view as a full-fledged '80s sci-fi classic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WHarrisBullzEye</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 08:15:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>