<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Popdose - Latest Comments in Why You Should Like&amp;#8230; The Ocean Blue</title><link>http://popdose.disqus.com/</link><description>Culturally inspired writing.</description><atom:link href="https://popdose.disqus.com/why_you_should_like_8230_the_ocean_blue_66/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 21:20:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why You Should Like&amp;#8230; The Ocean Blue</title><link>http://popdose.com/why-you-should-like-the-ocean-blue/#comment-55064750</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was a huge fan of New Wave and the first time I heard them I thought they were a just throw back band. But, I saw them on a locally produced video show  and heard more of their songs and I realized that they were much deeper. My favorite album is Beneath, with a perfect blend of the synth and guitar prominence. When Steve left the band they not only lost his keyboard but his excellent sax solos.  With Oed they developed more of a power pop sound but still very polished. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 21:20:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why You Should Like&amp;#8230; The Ocean Blue</title><link>http://popdose.com/why-you-should-like-the-ocean-blue/#comment-595362</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You could hardly have picked a better band to do a WYSL on.  At least for me.  I appreciate the retrospective on them.  They always sounded vaguely British to me but I did know they were from the US (although I was thinking Nebraska for some reason).  Good job.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jeff&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:16:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why You Should Like&amp;#8230; The Ocean Blue</title><link>http://popdose.com/why-you-should-like-the-ocean-blue/#comment-592483</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I still think their BENEATH THE RHYTHM AND SOUND album is their best.  Their unique blend of Johnny Marr/Byrds guitars and horns gets me every time!  I remember when MTV's 120 Minutes always played "Sublime."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CarlosRamirez</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:26:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why You Should Like&amp;#8230; The Ocean Blue</title><link>http://popdose.com/why-you-should-like-the-ocean-blue/#comment-591557</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sweet write-up as always, John.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think if anything the Ocean Blue were undone by this weird myth that every band must "progress." There's nothing &lt;i&gt;intrinsically&lt;/i&gt; wrong with your records being kind of samey, with doing one thing and doing it well—but it seems to be anathema in the pop world. I can think of only one band who were able to turn their very lack of "progress" into a selling point, and that's the Ramones. Everybody else is under constant pressure to reinvent themselves, even if they don't really need reinvention.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Cerulean&lt;/i&gt; wasn't a bad record, but you could sense the pressure behind it, the push for Schelzel to pursue some ideal of sophistication, even world-weariness, that simply didn't suit him. I mean: putting a song called "I've Sung One Too Many Songs for a Crowd That Didn't Want to Hear" on your &lt;i&gt;second album?&lt;/i&gt; When you're &lt;i&gt;22 years old&lt;/i&gt;, fa chrissakes? Dude, that's just Trying Too Hard.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack Feerick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:51:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>